Whistleblowers Would Like the House Financial Services Committee to Have Speaks About the PCAOB

While all this talk has been going on about the uncertain future of the PCAOB, a letter was sent on Feb. 10 to the chairs and ranking members of the House Financial Services Committee and the House Subcommittee on Investor Protection, Entrepreneurship, and Capital Markets, asking that a hearing be called for lawmakers to discuss the current mess that is the U.S. audit regulator.

The letter was sent to lawmakers by:

The House Financial Services Committee held a hearing in mid-January in which PCAOB Chairman William Duhnke and FASB Chairman Russell Golden testified, but lawmakers spent most of their time lambasting Golden and the FASB about the current expected credit loss (CECL) standard. Botta, Whitaker, POGO, et al. want the committee to hold a hearing focused squarely on the problems at the PCAOB:

We are writing to you today on to bring to your attention the urgency to organize a hearing in the House Financial Services Committee related to the risks for the financial market and the economy posed by the failures of major accounting firms and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), which is tasked with overseeing them. While we appreciate the Committee’s hearing on the PCAOB on January 15, 2020, the majority of the hearing was focused on the Financial Accounting Standards Board and not the PCAOB. As a result, the numerous problems at the PCAOB were not addressed. Therefore, we feel it necessary for your Committee to hold a hearing solely on the PCAOB to protect the economy and investors. …

A hearing of the House Financial Services Committee could look at the fundamental transparency, accountability, effectiveness, and conflict on interest issues at the PCAOB. Witnesses could include all relevant stakeholders including whistleblowers, regulators, civil society, and policy experts that can provide a holistic view of the critical issues facing the system. This country cannot afford another economic crisis, and the Financial Services Committee has a responsibility and duty to do everything in its power to ensure that regulators are adequately policing auditors and doing their jobs.

Here’s the full letter for your reading pleasure:

Have something to add to this story? Give us a shout by email, Twitter, or text/call the tipline at 202-505-8885. As always, all tips are anonymous.

Related articles

PwC Australia Staffers Looking at Pay Cuts of Up to 40%

Another day, another big accounting firm slashing staff salaries during the COVID-19 pandemic. This time it’s PwC Australia. At least P. Dubs hasn’t laid anyone off (yet) like KPMG Australia did. The Australian Financial Review reported today: Big four consulting firm PwC will cut the hours and pay of under-utilised staff by up to 40 […]