August 21, 2018

What’s the Cutoff Date for Leaving Your Accounting Firm Pre-Busy Season?

Are you in desperate need for advice from one of the GC hacks? Email us at [email protected] and we'll draw straws to see who gets to ruin your life.

Hello GC,
 
This is more of an opinion question from you and the GC community than actual advice. My question is particularly now before busy season, as I know some people are still debating GTFO of their current position, whether to jump ship to another firm or heading to the wonderful world of private. In your opinion (and that of the GC community) when is "too late" to leave before busy season? I think at this point it really is kind of a douche move to leave a public accounting firm as busy season looms. But where do you draw the line?
 
The reason I ask is that I was in this position last month (decision was already made, which is why I'm asking opinion rather than advice). A position at a smaller, closer-to-home, less-douchey partners, better-paying firm where a friend worked opened up and I jumped on it, as the position aligned with my personal goals much better than my previous firm. None of which is really important, so moving on. I gave my notice December 5th, which I thought was plenty of notice before busy season started (I should also note I'm only a second year staff, so replacing me really wasn't too earth-shatteringly difficult). The HR partner gave the "disagree with my timing, ethically questionable" line, which coming from a partner wasn't surprising, but what was surprising is even some fellow staff frowned upon my decision.
 
So my ultimate question. Where do you draw the line of being "too close" to busy season where it is ethically borderline to be leaving? Any comments from the peanut-gallery?
 
Sincerely,
 
Too Late to Change it Now
Dear Too Late,
 
There are really two schools of thought here. The first is that there is no such thing as too close. You leave when you want and fuck everyone else and the Honda Accord they drove to work in. The second is that leaving your firm with less than 120 days until January 1st (yes, I'm totally making that up) should be punishable by a torture system that gets increasingly more ghastly the closer your last day is to New Year's. Since both of these are ridiculous, I'll give you my opinion which, can all agree, will be gospel going forward? Great.
 
The cutoff is the Friday before Thanksgiving. How did I come to that seemingly random conclusion? Here is my rationale:
 
1. I got laid off from KPMG on Tuesday, November 11, 2008 between 4 and 5 pm Eastern Time in a tiny office on the 23rd floor by a KPMG partner and HR representative who will remain nameless. That's my best recollection anyway. No, this is not one of those Steve Buscemi-serial-killer-in-Billy-Madison moments. It was exactly a week after the presidential election, so it's easy to remember, plus I have a memory like a steel trap. ANYWAY, I didn't have to return to work after that day so it was obvious that presence was not going to be missed for the last 6-ish weeks of the year and presumably not missed during busy season. There were many other people laid off this day and I can only assume the same logic applies. If the firm doesn't need us in the second week of November, could the third week be any worse? I think not.
 
2. Giving notice the week of Thanksgiving is, quite simply, a shitty move. Why? Because you've given your co-workers something else to stress about that is completely unrelated to asshole family members and whether or not the sweet potatoes turn out perfect. Thanksgiving is meant to stress over these things, not for freaking out because "Suzy tax accountant is leaving for a WAY better job at a retail client who has great benefits, better pay and – GODDAMMIT, WHY DIDN'T I TAKE THAT JOB?" Their loved ones don't deserve that shit.
 
3. Notice in December is too close for comfort. Yes, there are four whole weeks of Hanukkah-ing and Christmas-ing but Jesus, Mary, and Joseph it's THE HOLIDAYS. People are stressing about gifts and snow storms and trying conceive a new dependent for next year. Plus, does anyone really work in the December. The answer is an unequivocal "NO." The last thing they want is your bomb-dropping that results in them scrambling around trying to plan what they will do without you in less than 30 days time.
 
So, Too Late, in my opinion and for the purposes of this little exercise, you cut it a little close. Officially, I'm firmly in the, "You GTFO whenever you can," camp but I have, at the very least, provided the barometer for those of you that sweat these things. 
 
Reactions? Fire away.

Related articles

Can We Stop Pretending That Fair Value Convergence Is Possible?

FASB IASB.jpgAnyone okay if we just called this whole convergence thing off? Seriously. We understand that many accountants are perfectionists but healthcare reform seems to have a better chance than this whole shitshow.
Yesterday’s Wall St. Journal claims that the FASB’s biggest wig, Bob Herz is stating, albeit implicitly, that the FASB’s fair value rule will be more strict than the IASB’s. Herz-dog, being a little more political put it this way:
Pleasant disagreement, after the jump

“I hope we can come up with something that both achieves convergence and improves the current state” of accounting rules, Herz said at a roundtable discussion on the fair-value issue at FASB headquarters. “We’re obviously keenly aware of the difficulties of achieving both goals together.”
Herz later said in an interview that while FASB would do its best to harmonize its approach and the IASB’s, “we also want to make sure we come up with a good answer” to improve financial statements that U.S. investors look to.

That’s about as combative as The Herz gets, although, we, like the Journal, will take any chance we can get to embellish otherwise, yawn-worthy comments made by wonky accounting bureaucrats.
More:

John Smith, an IASB member who also participated in the roundtable, said both boards will try to agree on a fair-value rule, but each has its own process to follow, and “at the end of the day, we won’t know until we finish the process.”
The difficulty in harmonizing the two approaches stems from the sharp disagreements over expanding the use of fair-value accounting. Smith called it “a religious war.”

Okay, so we’re not really convinced these guys give a damn either way if accounting rule convergence occurs, especially fair value. So would everyone just knock it off and quit pretending like it’s so bloody important?
Besides, this is a “religious war”. And everyone knows that wars in the name of the Almighty (in this case, GAAP) NEVER end, so let’s just count on this being unresolved through the next millennia.

Job of the Week: Do You Have a Preternatural Ability for GAAP Disclosures?

hire me2.jpgSince there seems to be some unhappy campers out there we’ll take a moment of your day to tell you about a position that might make you less miserable or hopefully better compensated:
Company: Morgan Stanley
Location: New York
Title: Associate/Manager
Description: Associate or Manager for our Legal Entity Accounting & Disclosure Group. Responsibilities will include gaining an understanding of the firm’s equity financing products, derivatives and securities lending business in order to assist in producing and analyzing many of the division’s financial accounting disclosures.
Skills Required: BS or BA in Finance and/or Accounting, CPA preferred; 3-5 years of experience in Public Accounting and/or financial services industry; Must have thorough understanding of FAS 133, FAS 140, FIN 46, FAS 157 and FAS 161 FASB pronouncements
See the full description at the GC Career Center and if this position doesn’t tickle your get your ass off the couch/ship-jumping bone, go to the main page and find your next temporary dream job.