August 21, 2018

IRS Grants Tax-Exempt Status to Lesbian ‘Pussy Worship’ Church

Pussy Church of Modern Witchcraft logo

Last week, Peter Reilly wrote in Forbes that an IRS decision to grant coveted tax-exempt status to the lesbian-centered Pussy Church of Modern Witchcraft was not well-received by individuals who believe the church’s sapphic stance to be exclusionary of men. Well duh, that’s kind of the point.

At a time when people who up until recently never thought twice about whether that tall lady at the mirror next to them in the restroom may have been born a man are suddenly taking sides on so-called bathroom bills, it’s an interesting time for a lesbian-led organization to come out (no pun) and take such a strong stance on the issue.

“The Pussy Church serves Women and Girls only. Males are not permitted to participate, regardless of how they identify. We expressly reject the concepts of gender identity, transgenderism, and gender as being meaningful to defining what a Woman or Girl is,” PCMW writes on its website. “We come together to form a congregation of adherents to our female born, lesbian-feminist-based religions beliefs and traditions,” it reads. “At Pussy Church, we serve Women and Girls and our emotional and spiritual needs. We cannot serve these needs in the presence of men, as men as a class are the cause of the harm that women experience globally.”

I’ll be honest: they ain’t wrong (please forward hate mail to me on Twitter). Though Antonia Elle D’orsay of The Trans 100 disagrees.

“This church is relying on a religious belief founded in secular materials which are often explicitly hostile to religion as a whole,” she told Forbes. “It would be like the IRS recognizing a group which promotes slavery texts as a basis — there is no genuine religious belief there.”

You mean … like the Bible? I’m no theologist but that thing is jam-packed with all kinds of messed up stuff. Take St. Paul in 1 Timothy 2:12 for example: “I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she must be silent.” Or, perhaps slightly more on topic, sage advice for the beholden in 1 Peter 2:18: “Slaves, submit yourselves to your masters with all respect, not only to the good and gentle but also to the cruel.”

The Pussy Church isn’t the first example of a controversial religious order enjoying the benefits of tax-exempt status. I mean, donations to the Westboro Baptist Church for them to purchase “God Hates Fags” signs for their next protest are tax-deductible for Christ’s sake. Or perhaps not for His sake, specifically.

Back to Forbes, Reilly says his source informed him that “the approval process was reasonably quick and there was no push-back from the IRS,” which he credits to good legal work on the part of the church.

He writes:

I think that the legal work that went into forming PCMW was quite good. The fact that it sailed through the approval process is not necessarily evidence of that since the IRS is under a lot of pressure and committed to speedily dealing with exempt applications. That is fallout from the seemingly interminable scandal. Nonetheless, as a layman, I see the handiwork of a good lawyer in the articles of PCMW. Whether an organization is a church or not as far as the IRS is concerned is a facts and circumstances determination that has nothing to do with its underlying belief system.

It is in this spirit that we have to recognize the IRS’s position here. In approving tax-exempt religious organizations, it is not up to them to determine whether or not that organization is morally ideal. To do so would go against the view of our founding fathers, who came to America for the purpose of religious freedom. Either we live in a country of religious freedom or we don’t, there is no in-between here.

Still, the public at large has every right to hem and haw over whether or not this decision is just. The IRS simply used its “is this a church” checklist to approve the church’s application for exempt status. Since 2011, the IRS has allowed transgender peeps to deduct the costs of hormone therapy and sex reassignment surgery from their gross income as medical expenses for the treatment of gender identity disorder, so no reasonable person could say the IRS hates trans people. Hell, the IRS hates all of us equally. God bless ’em.

The Accounting News Roundup newsletter is back! Every Friday you’ll get a recap of recent content posted on Going Concern, On This Date in Going Concern History, list of hot remote and hybrid accounting jobs, and more. Sign up here today.

2 Comments

  1. “It is in this spirit that we have to recognize the IRS’s position here. In approving tax-exempt religious organizations, it is not up to them to determine whether or not that organization is morally ideal.”

    This is a great point. It’s probably why the Catholic church still has tax-exempt status.

    P.S. Having “Pussy Worship” in the article heading is great click bait. It worked on me. Well done, HG.

  2. Welcome back, already this site is worth reading again.

    As to the issue at hand, if Smilin’ Joel Osteen can have his church own his homes and helicopters, and be tax-exempt (and not even have to file a 990), then Pussy Church shouldn’t have to worry about it either. Both are equally fake and fraudulent.

Leave a Reply

Related articles

Going Concern is Not Immune to the Michael Jackson Circus

1.michael_jackson_71246050015.jpgWe’ve been able to avoid the whole Michael Jackson debacle up until now. We couldn’t, in good blogging conscience, avoid this particular story.
The estate of Michael Jackson is probably going to have to turn over at least $80 million to the IRS and they get to cut the line right to the front to collect.
“As in a bankruptcy case, Jackson’s creditors will jockey for first crack at his fortune. But the estate’s initial obligation will be to pay the late star’s taxes, said Beth Kaufman, a Washington-based attorney specializing in estate tax issues. ‘There is no question that the U.S. government has first priority,’ she said.
Oh, and the Service is not going to take the royalty rights to She Loves You or I am the Walrus either:

To settle his tax bill, the executors of his estate may have to sell or borrow against lucrative but hard-to-value assets or ask the IRS for a multi-year extension. That could allow the estate to pay the tab over time with earnings from Jackson’s share in rights to songs by the Beatles and his own music — prized properties whose value will likely make the estate’s tax bill only bigger. “The government is not going to take a Beatles record as payment. They want to be paid in cash,” said Roy Kozupsky, a veteran estate lawyer in New York who has worked on behalf of several wealthy clients.

Reportedly, Jackson still made $40 million a year from his ownership of the recordings. This will no doubt make the calculation of the tax bill more complicated and thus, we’ll continue to be saturated with all the excruciating details about this story that we just don’t want to hear.
Death and taxes: Big IRS bill looms for MJ estate [AP via TaxProf Blog]

UBS Names Needed so We Can Pay for Healthcare Otherwise We’ll Have to Print More Money

obama_point.jpg“Rich people, I want your money.”
No, seriously. Hand it over.
We’ve covered the failure (so far) of the IRS to get UBS to name names on 52,000 Americans and we’ve heard some good suggestions but maybe chocolate isn’t what the Service is interested in.
The House passed a pricey healthcare proposal yesterday and B to the O wanted it to be “budget neutral” which means, “We’re in a deep hole you clowns. Don’t make it deeper.”
Charged with said task, they went to a cocktail party got to work and came up with a solution that they super-duper rich will foot the bill via taxes. That means, IRS, get your shit together, because Nancy Pelosi has had enough of rich people, that aren’t her, not paying their fair share of taxes. Swiss bank account holders beware, here are the gory details that you’ll be getting in on if your name gets dropped:

Under the $1.2 trillion plan passed by the Democratic-controlled House of Representatives, the wealthiest 1.2 percent of U.S. households would have to pay an additional $540 billion in taxes over the next 10 years via an income surtax of between 1 and 5.4 percent. For the super-elite, those in the top 10th of 1 percent (and presumably the type of taxpayers who have Swiss bank accounts), that works out to an additional $280,000 a year in taxes on an average annual income of $2.3 million a year, according to the Tax Policy Center.

So basically it looks as though the IRS needs to close the tax gap because…wait for it…there’s shit to pay for! We’re not slapping healthcare on the Federal Reserve credit card, no, no. Right here and now we start paying for stuff out of our own pockets. So get on these Swiss banks and get the names because they’re avoiding their patriotic duty.
Obama’s self-defeating war on the wealthy [James Pethokoukis/Reuters]