September 20, 2018

IFRS Foundation’s Cool Club Doesn’t Require Support of IFRS, Rather Something That Would Closely Resemble IFRS

Back in November, the IASB threw out this Accounting Standards Advisory Forum idea that would allow a dozen national rulemaking bodies to get together and talk fancy about debits and credits. An accounting cool club, if you will. There was one small catch — anyone in the club had to sign on as supporters of IFRS.

That gave some people (read: the FASB) the willies, so they've scrapped that idea:

Promoting the adoption of IFRS will not be a prerequisite for standard setters to participate in a new forum the IFRS Foundation is forming to advise the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) on technical standard-setting issues. Documents released Friday showed that the IFRS Foundation is dropping the proposed requirement. This move and other changes in language from the original proposal could facilitate FASB’s participation in the forum.
Whew! That should make everyone a little more comfortable. Of course, there are still conditions to get into the accounting cool club:
The foundation is requiring national and regional standard setters that wish to participate in the forum to sign a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the foundation. 
Okay, sign a memo, you're in the club and there's no tie to IFRS. Seems reasonable enough. HOWEVAH!
The MoU proposal requires participants to agree to support and contribute to the foundation in its mission to develop a single set of high-quality, understandable, enforceable and globally accepted financial reporting standards.

In other words, the IFRS Foundation is saying that you can be in club as long as you get behind a "high-quality, understandable, enforceable and globally accepted financial reporting standards" that they aren't saying is IFRS, but is something that probably looks, sounds, and tastes a lot like IFRS without all that IFRS aftertaste. "Diet IFRS" or "IFRS Zero" or "New IFRS" or something.

As hilarious as this completely transparent effort by the IASB is, the Financial Accounting Foundation is playing along for now:

Robert Stewart, FAF’s vice president for communications, said in a statement that FAF appreciates the responsiveness the IFRS Foundation demonstrated in revising its proposal. “As we said in our comment letter, we believe the establishment of the ASAF represents an important opportunity for greater cooperation and collaboration among standard setters,” Stewart said. “We are in the process of reviewing the revised materials, including the proposed new commitments.”
And we'll get our rejection letter drafted ASAP. 
 

Related articles

Face It People, Nothing Much Can Be Done About the Revolving Door

Revolving_Door2.jpgThere’s constant conspiracy theories bellyaching about certain companies getting their former big shots into public service and regulatory positions (we’re talking about you, Maxine Waters).
Well now there’s speculation about former Big 4 partners working at the IASB.
We get it, those who used to work at the big firms shouldn’t be writing the rules. So who the hell is going to do it? Shall we have the likes of Friehling & Horowitz appointed as the standard setters?
The large firms have the biggest pool to choose out of, so natch they’re going to have some of the better candidates to delve into this wonky rule-writing stuff. We’re probably lucky that there are people out there that actually want to serve on these boards, lots of Big 4 partners can barely turn on their computers.

IASB Discusses MD&A and No One Cares

Do you spend evenings and weekends reading annual reports as opposed to doing, say, anything? We thought so. So you’re definitely familiar with the cheerleading section in those glossy marketing pieces known as “Management Discussion and Analsyis” or “MD&A”.
Well the IASB has decided that MD&A isn’t worth getting too worked up about as three board members voted “meh”, against issuing an actual proposal that would give management guidance on content. Sayeth:

Because the proposal will not result in a financial reporting standard, issuing it is not an effective use of IASB resources or those of constituents who may feel an obligation to comment, say the three board members, Robert Garnett, Prabhakar Kalavacherla, and James Leisenring.

Common sense appears to be alive and kicking at the IASB. Hoo-RAH.

International Standard Setters Have Their Say on MD&A
[CFO.com]