Here Are a Couple of Charts That Sum Up Auditor Fees since 2002

Courtesy of our friends at Audit Analytics, who have just issued a new study evaluating the trends of audit fees and non-audit fees earned from accelerated filers over the past 11 years. 

As you can see, it appears that audit firms have found a comfort zone in its split between audit/non-audit fees.

2002 -- Those were the days, amiright?!And in this table, "Total Revenue" indicates the top line for the population of accelerated filers in the study and as you can see, fees as a % of those revenues have shrunk nearly every year.  

To expand on footnote 3, non-audit fees consist of audit related fees, benefit plan, financial information systems design, tax, and other/miscellaneous related fees.

Compliance Week has a nice summary of the report. Discuss as you see fit.

Have something to add to this story? Give us a shout by email, Twitter, or text/call the tipline at 202-505-8885. As always, all tips are anonymous.

Related articles

Which Big 4 Firm Had the Most IPO Audit Clients In Q3 2019?

The firm that puts the EY in cringEworthY training seminars for women audited the most initial public offerings in the third quarter, according to a new analysis from Audit Analytics. #Auditor Market Share for 53 #IPO companies in Q3 2019: EY: [20.8%];Marcum: [13.2%];Deloitte: [11.3%];PwC: [11.3%];KPMG: [11.3%];All Others: [32.1%] — Audit Analytics (@AuditAnalytics) October 10, 2019 […]

Critical Audit Matters: Does Anybody Care?

As if the standard auditor’s opinion weren’t already sleep-inducing enough. Standards in the United States now require auditors to identify critical audit matters (CAMs) in their reports on the financial statements of large public companies—things that, in the language of Auditing Standard 3101.11 of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, involved “especially challenging, subjective, or […]