October 22, 2018

Grant Thornton Gets Dinged for Giving Partners with Audit Quality Issues More Work

grant thornton uk ftse

The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board has announced a big settlement with Grant Thornton over quality control violations and audit failures. The firm was censured and agreed to pay a $1.5 million civil penalty.

The quality control violations related to the assignment of two Philadelphia-based partners to audits in 2013 when they had been cited for shoddy work in the past. The work on one, the audit of The Bancorp Inc., violated PCAOB standards. The partner on the job, David M. Burns, was also sanctioned and fined $15,000 for violating audit standards in the 2013 audit of Bancorp. Mr. Burns retired from Grant Thornton in July 2016.

You can read all the gory details if you like in the order, but the most interesting thing of note is GT’s acknowledgment that Mr. Burns’s workload was excessive but then failed to rectify the situation.

Can we get a show of hands from those who are surprised by this? … … … No? No one? Okay.

To make matters only slightly worse, resources on the Bancorp team were tight and got tighter:

An overworked partner who relies on his/her senior manager to keep things moving despite a leaner and greener staff? It’s hard to imagine a major firm that isn’t dealing with situations like this.

According to the PCAOB, the firm and Mr. Burns “failed to sufficiently consider red flags or contrary evidence indicating that certain commercial loans were impaired and relied on management representations without obtaining relevant and reliable evidence to corroborate those representations.” When Bancorp restated its results, its allowance for loan and leases increased by 98 percent for 2013 and 403 percent in 2012. Yikes.

As for the second partner (aka “Partner B”) mentioned in this order, the circumstances were a little different. Partner B still had a history of substandard work; however, the firm was putting pressure on this person to shape up. According to the order, GT put the partner on a performance improvement plan and that, as some of you know all too well, meant business:

“APR” is “audit practice reviews” for those of you not familiar with the Grant Thornton lingo.

This performance improvement plan sounds all well and good, but they didn’t make good on their threat until it was too late:

I suppose there are some takeaways, so here’s a few off the top: 1) Giving an overworked person more work is rarely a good idea; 2) A team that is strapped for resources will not become better if you further strap their resources; 3) If a person is struggling at their job, giving them more work is NOT the answer.

Plus, all the auditing stuff, of course. I think that covers it.

[PCAOB, Order, Burns]

Related articles

Grant Thornton and the Antichrist

al pacino_devil.jpgIt’s rather mysterious that the New York office of Grant Thornton is located at 666 Third Ave. As I’m sure our more pious readers know, the significance of the 666 is commonly known as “The Number of the Beast“. We won’t get into any more specifics than that other than to mention that it is a pretty creepy-ass looking number.
Is G to the T run by a secret group of Al Pacino-esque figures that are working against the forces of good?
Maybe not but the otherwise boring-assness of that particular lobby is def working too hard to not be noticed…

SHOCKER: Doesn’t Appear that Stanford Auditors were Doing Any Auditing

allen-stanford_1018295c.jpgLast week’s indictment of Allen Stanford has brought up the always popular question when fraud, occurs: “Who are the auditors that were asleep at the wheel of this disaster?”
Well, in this case, the auditors were a local UK two-person shop, CAS Hewlett, which must be Queen’s English for Friehling & Horowitz.
It doesn’t appear that CAS Hewlett has a website, but they’ve been doing the Stanford “audits” for at least 10 years, so obv they’re legit. PwC and KPMG both have offices on Antigua but Stanford preferred to stay with its “trusted firm”. Totally understandable.
And the best part? The founder of the firm, Charlesworth “Shelly” Hewlett died in January, approximately a month before the story broke on the Ponz de Stanford.
This all adds up to who-the-fuck-knows if audits were even occurring and for us to speculate if Shelly needed to get got because Stan knew that the poo and fan were coming together. Just sayin’.