Stop Me If You’ve Heard This One Before: FRC Reprimands KPMG U.K. for Crappy Audit

When it comes to the Financial Reporting Council and KPMG audits, it must be like shooting fish in a barrel. This time, the U.K. accounting watchdog fined KPMG £2.1 million ($2.7 million) on Aug. 20 following the Big 4 firm’s admission of misconduct on the audit of fashion company Ted Baker Plc’s financial statements in 2013 and 2014, according to a Bloomberg report.

In addition, Michael Francis Barradell, KPMG senior statutory auditor and audit engagement partner, was fined £46,800 by the FRC.

So, what did they do this time? (Say it in the tone of a parent resigned to the fate that his or her child is always getting into trouble. It’s fun!) Well, according to Bloomberg:

The misconduct arose from KPMG providing expert witness services to Ted Baker in a London lawsuit, the FRC said. This was in breach of ethical standards and led to the loss of KPMG’s independence in respect of the company’s audits.

“Ethical standards are critical in supporting the confidence that third-party users can reasonably have in financial statements in circumstances where, of necessity, they only have incomplete information to judge whether the auditor is in fact objective,” Claudia Mortimore, interim executive counsel at the FRC, said in a statement. “Where those standards are breached such that the auditor’s independence is lost, user confidence is likely to be undermined.”

And according to an FRC press release, “there was a self-interest threat arising from the fact that the fees for the expert engagement significantly exceeded the audit fees in the relevant years, which KPMG and Mr. Barradell also failed properly to consider.”

KPMG’s fine was reduced from £3 million because the firm settled the case, while Barradell’s fine was reduced from £80,000 because he agreed to settle.

In an emailed statement to Bloomberg, KPMG said the firm’s audit opinions on Ted Baker’s financial statements have not been called into question. KPMG continually seeks to review and improve its processes and in 2017 decided not to undertake expert witness work for any company audited by KPMG U.K.

While each of the Big 4 firms has been reamed by the FRC lately for poor audit quality, KPMG seems to have gotten the brunt of the watchdog’s ire. Hell, the firm recently hired a risk management chief because of all the trouble it has been in.

Back in June, the FRC said KPMG auditors don’t challenge management enough, aren’t sufficiently skeptical, and are inconsistent in their execution of audits. The FRC called the firm’s decline in audit quality over the last five years “unacceptable.” This was after the watchdog fined KPMG £4.5 million (reduced to £3.2 million) for misconduct related to the audit of Quindell.

Then there’s the FRC’s ongoing investigation into KPMG’s auditing of the now-collapsed Carillion, which KPMG U.K. Chairman Bill Michael defended, and another FRC investigation into KPMG’s audit of British beverage wholesaler Conviviality’s financial statements.

Good thing KPMG has kept its nose clean in the United States and South Africa, right? Yeah. Right.

The Accounting News Roundup newsletter is back! Every Friday you’ll get a recap of recent content posted on Going Concern, On This Date in Going Concern History, list of hot remote and hybrid accounting jobs, and more. Sign up here today.

Image: Shutterstock/rkjaer

Related articles

What Price Wrong-Doing? Sanctions Against KPMG Are Complicated

“Sell in May and go away” was an investors’ adage invoked as vacation strategy in a more genteel era. Returns in the summer were said to lag the rest of the year—and in any event, that’s how brokers justified their holiday cottages on the eastern seaboard. This year the maxim has twice failed my attempt […]