October 23, 2018

Ready or Not: Auditors Descend on Department of Defense

audit dod department of defense

It’s not as cool as a multi-ship C-17 formation dropping paratroopers as a part of a training exercise (like the one that everyone thought was a UFO on Saturday night). But, our profession’s only semi-equivalent — 2,400 red-pen wielding auditors — will infiltrate the Department of Defense (DoD) this month to kick butt and take names. They say it’s going to be a yearly audit with a November 15 issue date.

We’ll see what damage we can cause. The DoD has never actually been audited. It’s just been a big ol’ elephant in the room for decades.

But, the grace period is over. Now we have to brace ourselves for the mess. Even I’ve witnessed what I would consider “fraud, waste, and abuse,” as the military likes to call it. I’m sure there’s a reason we’ve turned a blind eye to this quagmire for so long. Taxpayers might not want to know.

NPR reported:

This summer, Norquist [Defense Department Comptroller / Chief Financial Officer] was asked by Defense News if the looming audit was “the biggest bugaboo of the job.”

Norquist replied, “I don’t think of it as a bugaboo. I think of it as a great opportunity.”

I appreciate his tenacity; someone has to take on the job since the DoD was federally mandated to be audit-ready by Sept. 30, 2017. But, bugaboo is putting it gently. This comptroller news release puts it into perspective:

With more than $2.4 trillion in assets, this financial statement audit is one of the largest ever undertaken in history. The DoD OIG hired independent public accounting firms to conduct audits of individual components, as well as a Department-wide consolidated audit to summarize all results and conclusions. Beginning in 2018, our audits will occur annually, with reports issued November 15.

Let’s at least learn from the mistakes Grant Thornton made during the Marine Corp audit:

“The bottom line is GT did not adequately document or support their conclusion about” the reliability of the Marine Corps’ record-keeping, he wrote. The firm had not made sure that financial data in the Marine Corps’ computer systems was accurate, he said in the email, and the inspector general’s team had to do “compensating work” as a result.

And who’s on the hook to deliver the final audit opinion for the agency-wide DoD audit?

KPMG (Army), EY (Air Force), and Cotton and Company (Navy) had been tapped in the past for individual branch audits as they ramped up for the agency-wide shindig. But, Caleb speculated late last week that it might be PwC:

Although PwC is fully committed to expanding its lucrative advisory business, the DoD is the type of crown jewel audit client the firm craves. By spinning off the government consulting arm, the firm would be able to pitch its services “with the full commitment to the integrity of the process” something-something.

We’ve reached out to everyone we can think to get the dish on who it actually is… no comment yet from Norquist and friends, or the chief Pentagon spokesperson. We’ll report back if we hear anything definitive.

And it does start to get a little more complicated with independence thrown into the mix. The Big 4 have been noodling in the federal services consulting for a while. Francine McKenna reminds of some of the history that may come into play when these decisions are being made:

Whoever it is, I anticipate they have already started their security clearance processing for the couple thousand auditors. That always takes forever, and if they have any hope to issue a report by next November, there’s no time to lose. I can imagine the security clearance required to do an inventory count of the U.S.’ defensive stockpiles is rather excessive.

Related articles

Ernst & Young Is Here to Help (For a Small Fee)!

ernst_young.jpgWe thought that Ernst & Young was advising the New York Fed on the winding down of AIG out of the goodness of their hearts but it turns out it’s actually about the money.
E&Y could make as much as $60 million advising the New York Fed, which is 50% more than the initial agreement, according to Bloomberg. The NYF is also reimbursing E&Y for expenses, up to 10% of the professional fees. This occurs after the parties had initially said $40 million would be the cap but $60 mil is it, we swear, no more.
And because E&Y is solid like that, the firm is billing out partners and directors at discounted rates ($775/hour). I mean, ’cause, let’s face it, this thing’s a mess and E&Y is going to be working hard, working late, working weekends.
Ernst & Young’s Maximum Pay for AIG Advice Swells [Bloomberg]

Our Speculation About the Motivation Behind Deloitte’s Most Recent Survey

heelys.jpgBig accounting firms like doing surveys. We’ve often thought about the motivation behind the constant surveys and further wonder if firms ever josh the numbers around out of a personal vendetta against its rivals, enemies, former clients, etc.
Deloitte’s survey that states that American consumers are planning on spending less this back-to-school season causes us to speculate as to why the Big D would do such a survey? It’s a nice little press release we suppose. Shows that the firm is plugged into the current state of the economy, etc., etc. But then we got to thinking about how Heelys, the obnoxious shoes with wheels, recently dumped Deloitte because their fees were too high in favor of Grant Thornton.
Far be it from us to speculate about the temperament of a Big 4 accounting firm when it has business swiped away by a second-tier firm but isn’t it possible that Deloitte is bitter about the whole sitch? Isn’t it possible that Deloitte is merely putting out this survey as a way to scare consumers out of spending money on back-to-school junk like Heelys?
Back-to-School Shoppers Plan to Spend Less, Save More [Bloomberg]