The SEC has fined Deloitte over $1 million for violating auditor independence rules.
The consulting side of the house had a thing going with a trustee, Andrew Boynton, of three funds the firm audited. Deloitte did self-report the violation in 2012, although at that point, the firm had been violation for five years. Sounds like they have a ways to go to be the auditor's auditor.
Also! The Journal's Angela Chen points out that there seems to be something going around:
In July 2014, for instance, Ernst & Young LLP agreed to pay $4.07 million to settle SEC allegations that an E&Y subsidiary had improperly lobbied congressional staff on behalf of two E&Y audit clients. In January 2014, KPMG LLP agreed to pay $8.2 million after the SEC said it provided non-audit services such as bookkeeping and payroll to affiliates of two of its audit clients, and hired a recently retired tax counsel of a third client’s affiliate only to loan him back to the affiliate to do the same work.
So we have three notable independence violation settlements in 18 months, a relatively short period of time. What should we call this growing string of broken independence?
Is it a "rash" of violations? An "epidemic"? Maybe an "independence turkey"? Or just another version of the same joke? Give it some thought so we're ready for the next one.

Deloitte has managed to get itself into more trouble in Italy. After settling the lawsuit with freakishly