The dynamics at both the PCAOB and the Big Four are horrible. The incentive at the Big Four is to keep prices down to the point at which it’s impossible for a new entrant to break into their charmed group; after all, if it means they end up cutting corners, the worst that happens is that they get gummed by the toothless PCAOB. [Felix Salmon/Reuters]
Related Posts
What’s a Day in the Life of a Typical Audit Intern?
- Adrienne Gonzalez
- June 13, 2014
The New Jersey Society of CPAs has a breakdown of an average day for an […]
Share this:
Auditors Reminded That If They Keeping Screwing Up, They’ll Be Making the CAQ’s Job a Lot Harder
- Adrienne Gonzalez
- December 5, 2014
Auditors, consider this your friendly reminder not to fuck things up this busy season. Just […]
Share this:
Study: Investors Might Want to Tread Carefully Around Companies with High Audit Fees
- Caleb Newquist
- September 27, 2011
[R]esearch finds auditing fees charged to companies to be significantly related to the their financial performance for as long as five years into the future: the higher the fees this year, the lower firms’ performance next year and beyond. In the words of the journal report by Jonathan D. Stanley of Auburn University, “Primary results indicate a significant inverse relation between audit fees and the one-year ahead change in clients’ operating performance… Further analysis reveals that the primary results extend to changes in operating performance observed up to five years after the fee is disclosed; are more pronounced for future negative versus positive chances; and [are] applicable to future changes in earnings unaccounted for by analysts’ forecasts.” Asked if these findings are likely to be of value to average investors, Prof. Stanley answers in one word: “Definitely.” [AAA]