[T]he tediously-reported proclamation of real convergence commitment has never been more than a smokescreen behind which the divergent interests of the Americans and the Europeans have knocked heads to the point of insensibility. (For which, recall the continued fudging of the SEC as to whether, if ever, that agency is even going to confirm a date certain on which to decide if to weigh in or not […].) Why no-one has called the question on this endless charade reflects the two-level fantasy in the dialog: the IASB and the FASB both pretend to believe in the desirability of fully-converged accounting standards, and the community of financial statement issuers and users pretend to believe them. [Re:Balance]
Related Posts
Grant Thornton Wants to Have a Threesome?
- Adrienne Gonzalez
- July 18, 2024
Who doesn’t, amirite? Financial Times is reporting that Grant Thornton US, now flush with all […]
Friday Footnotes: PwC Loses; Gamers Rise Up Against the IRS; Another Naughty CPA | 2.14.20
- Going Concern News Desk
- February 14, 2020
Ed. note: Happy Valentine’s Day, kids! If no one loves you, remember I always will. […]
Carmine Di Sibio Will Be King of Advisory If EY Splits
- Going Concern News Desk
- December 15, 2022
It was 1985 when Italian-born Carmine Di Sibio joined EY as an auditor, 34 years […]
