Overstock.com Blames Restatements on Accountants

Last week the financial three-ring circus Overstock.com officially put an end to its 2009 by filing its 10-K with the SEC (after a two week extension). Ringmaster Patrick Byrne managed to keep his promise about turning a profit and managed to keep his head about it in his letter to shareholders only mustering, "It's nice to be profitable."

As you might expect, Sam Antar was not impressed and since the Company's filing he and others (including Gary Weiss) have pointed out major internal control problems, mistakes in the footnotes, false disclosures related to an alleged "tax dodge" and now, NOW the most unforgivable thing yet.

Sam notes that the Company, in its infinite wisdom, has decided to blame its own accountants and their lack of knowledge for the most recent restatement in its 10-K:

We lacked a sufficient number of accounting professionals with the necessary knowledge, experience and training to adequately account for and perform adequate supervisory reviews of significant transactions that resulted in misapplications of GAAP.

Information technology program change and program development controls were inadequately designed to prevent changes in our accounting systems which led to the failure to appropriately capture and accurately process data.

These are the only two "control failures" identified by the Company in its filing that constitute material weaknesses. Naturally, the management team and the audit committee agreed with this assessment, "Our management concluded, and the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors agreed with management's conclusions," that former CFO David Chidester and former Treasurer Rich Paongo are the ones at fault here.

Is that class or what? So did Patrick Byrne finally realize that David Chidester and Rich Paongo, after several years at Overstock, lacked the "necessary knowledge, experience and training" so they and the Company "parted ways" (aka fired their sorry asses) for the latest restatement? What about the previous umpteen restatements? Why wasn't didn't the parting of ways occur after those?

Regardless of the answers to these questions, Sam has appealed to none other than Mary Schapiro to make sure the shenanigans don't continue:

From: Sam E. Antar
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 3:56 AM
To: 'Mary Schapiro'; 'enforcement@sec.gov';
Cc: 'Patrick Byrne'; 'Joseph Tabacco'; 'Board - Jonathan Johnson'
Subject: Open Letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (Part 8): Bring Enforcement Action Against Overstock.com for False and Misleading Disclosures
Importance: High

To Chairperson Mary Schapiro:

Enclosed is a link to my blog post entitled, “Open Letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (Part 8): Bring Enforcement Action Against Overstock.com for False and Misleading Disclosures.”

Link here: http://whitecollarfraud.blogspot.com/2010/04/open-letter-to-securities-and-exchange.html

The blog post referred to in the link above, is to be considered a formal complaint to the SEC for continued false and misleading disclosures by Overstock.com and its officers. Please note that as a courtesy, I have cc’d Overstock.com on this email.

Respectfully,

Sam E. Antar

Is the SEC not interested in a slam dunk case? We'll see.

Comments