So it's the Monday after the Super Bowl and most of you are suffering from some kind of hangover. Whether it was caused by food, booze or you're simply wallowing in a lack of a Peyton Manning comeback, this day should really be a national holiday (even non-football fans can agree on that notion). Melancholy, indigestion and cocktail flues aside, the other certainty that comes with the SB is gambling. And we're not talking friendly-poker-game gambling, we're talking recklessly wagering on every single aspect of the biggest spectacle in sports gambling. Two of the most creative wagers we've seen so far was the betting on rating for the Focus on the Family (featuring Tim Tebow and Mamma Tebow!) ad and the betting the spread between Kim Kardashian's measurements and Reggie Bush's rushing and receiving production. Both of which are completely ridiculous, yet sheer genius. Regardless of where you put your money yesterday (we took the overs on Archie Manning appearances and lost), there are plenty of big winners from yesterday's game. And now that we have a government who is feverishly trying to close a deficit gap, the question remains: will the IRS more aggressively pursue taxpayers for their unreported gambling winnings? If you're a degenerate loser than this obviously doesn't apply to you but if you're lucky enough to find some extra scratch in your pocket, you're legally obligated to report that income next year. Our government is looking for solutions anywhere possible, so it's entirely possible that you could find yourself on the wrong end of an IRS-issued shotgun if you're leaving your winnings off next year's 1040. Look, it's not that crazy and the pols need all the ideas they can get. You've been warned.
Related Posts
Retired Accountant Among Those Slain in Pittsburgh Synagogue Massacre
- Jason Bramwell
- October 29, 2018
Melvin Wax, an 88-year-old retired accountant, was one of 11 people killed when a gunman […]
Apparently This Debt Ceiling Thing Is Important
- Adrienne Gonzalez
- July 26, 2011
I’m intentionally avoiding the news – partially due to the fact that Lawrence O’Donnell looks like a melting wax statue in HD and also that it got old a long time ago.
The Guardian catches everyone up by declaring the battle between Obama and the Republicans over the national debt has reached a new level and claimed that both sides were kind of pushing each other out of the spotlight.
At least that’s how the media played it yesterday. Chris Matthews called it a “slingshot operation by Republicans” on Lawrence O’Donnell (don’t ask why I watch MSNBC), more specifically implying that it was staged by Boehner & Co. to look like a knock off of Obama’s Prime Time address. Matthews also got pissed at Obama for going on national TV to do this; as if an address to the American people had anything to do with the American people.
What I took away from Obama’s speech was that he wanted our current and future creditors to know that he would get a debt ceiling increase, just let me pretend I’m going to cut some spending so we can get more money. It had very little to do with Americans or our perception of what debt means to our day-to-day lives, except for the part where he declared we’d have higher interest rates, more trouble securing loans and huge unemployment numbers.
Obama also got really dirty and quoted Ronald Reagan.
Apparently, at the end of this America banded together and crashed a bunch of Congressional websites. Not quite sure what that was supposed to accomplish but I guess it’s cute to see us working together for a change to accomplish something.
Just what I thought I saw.
Monday Morning Accounting News Brief: UK Big 4 Firms Overhired, Dump Staff; KPMG Bracing For (Another) Big Fine | 9.25.23
- Adrienne Gonzalez
- September 25, 2023
Happy Monday, here we are again. Let’s dispense with the pleasantries and get to it. […]
