<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Grant Thornton: Patrick Byrne&#8217;s Pants Are on Fire</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goingconcern.com/2009/11/grant-thornton-patrick-byrnes-pants-are-on-fire/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goingconcern.com/2009/11/grant-thornton-patrick-byrnes-pants-are-on-fire/</link>
	<description>Accounting News for Accountants &#38; CFOs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 01:07:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://goingconcern.com/2009/11/grant-thornton-patrick-byrnes-pants-are-on-fire/comment-page-1/#comment-4046</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.goingconcern.com/2009/11/grant-thornton-patrick-byrnes-pants-are-on-fire/#comment-4046</guid>
		<description>One of the larger firms will probably end up taking them on, but it may be after some regulator fallout (probably in response to a restatement and at fees commensurate with the risk).  Obviously the SEC, and NASDAQ, have read the letter from GT, and I doubt they&#039;re going to ignore the fact that Byrne is going rogue for long - even barring NASDAQ&#039;s former comment that they had until January to find a replacement auditor (which they&#039;re obviously going to have trouble finding, now).
It&#039;s funny - you never actually see somebody in the business world make such a bonehead play like this dumbass just did...  Did he think that CPAs just take it up the kazoo from whichever CEO comes along?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the larger firms will probably end up taking them on, but it may be after some regulator fallout (probably in response to a restatement and at fees commensurate with the risk).  Obviously the SEC, and NASDAQ, have read the letter from GT, and I doubt they&#8217;re going to ignore the fact that Byrne is going rogue for long &#8211; even barring NASDAQ&#8217;s former comment that they had until January to find a replacement auditor (which they&#8217;re obviously going to have trouble finding, now).<br />
It&#8217;s funny &#8211; you never actually see somebody in the business world make such a bonehead play like this dumbass just did&#8230;  Did he think that CPAs just take it up the kazoo from whichever CEO comes along?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://goingconcern.com/2009/11/grant-thornton-patrick-byrnes-pants-are-on-fire/comment-page-1/#comment-4045</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.goingconcern.com/2009/11/grant-thornton-patrick-byrnes-pants-are-on-fire/#comment-4045</guid>
		<description>Nothing like a good Byrne burn!
It sounds like GT accepted the risk, used an appropriate tolerance level, and acted on tainted communications. Good for GT...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing like a good Byrne burn!<br />
It sounds like GT accepted the risk, used an appropriate tolerance level, and acted on tainted communications. Good for GT&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://goingconcern.com/2009/11/grant-thornton-patrick-byrnes-pants-are-on-fire/comment-page-1/#comment-4044</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.goingconcern.com/2009/11/grant-thornton-patrick-byrnes-pants-are-on-fire/#comment-4044</guid>
		<description>Give GT some credit for having a pair!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Give GT some credit for having a pair!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
