<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: (UPDATE) Deloitte Still Stalling on Global Revenue Numbers</title> <atom:link href="http://goingconcern.com/2009/09/update-deloitte-still-stalling-on-global-revenue-numbers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://goingconcern.com/2009/09/update-deloitte-still-stalling-on-global-revenue-numbers/</link> <description>Accounting News for Accountants &#38; CFOs</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 04:45:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: guest</title><link>http://goingconcern.com/2009/09/update-deloitte-still-stalling-on-global-revenue-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-2457</link> <dc:creator>guest</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 14:06:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://wp.goingconcern.com/2009/09/update-deloitte-still-stalling-on-global-revenue-numbers/#comment-2457</guid> <description>Is it just me or did D&amp;T screw up the presentation.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.deloitte.com/view/en_US/us/press/Facts-Figures/index.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.deloitte.com/view/en_US/us/press/Facts-Figures/index.htm&lt;/a&gt;
They state that revenue was &quot;10,694&quot; for 2009 and not that revenue is ($ billions).  So that equates to $10 TRILLION.  Wow, they should be the ones bailing out the banks.
Either change it to $ millions or put a decimal point in. And next time at least get an experienced staff person to check it and not an intern - I know they cost a little more but it the experience helps to avoid this little fuck ups.
Please make the changes and send the revised draft to me for my review... </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it just me or did D&#038;T screw up the presentation.<br
/> <a
href="http://www.deloitte.com/view/en_US/us/press/Facts-Figures/index.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.deloitte.com/view/en_US/us/press/Facts-Figures/index.htm</a><br
/> They state that revenue was &#8220;10,694&#8243; for 2009 and not that revenue is ($ billions).  So that equates to $10 TRILLION.  Wow, they should be the ones bailing out the banks.<br
/> Either change it to $ millions or put a decimal point in. And next time at least get an experienced staff person to check it and not an intern &#8211; I know they cost a little more but it the experience helps to avoid this little fuck ups.<br
/> Please make the changes and send the revised draft to me for my review&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: guest</title><link>http://goingconcern.com/2009/09/update-deloitte-still-stalling-on-global-revenue-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-2456</link> <dc:creator>guest</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 00:51:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://wp.goingconcern.com/2009/09/update-deloitte-still-stalling-on-global-revenue-numbers/#comment-2456</guid> <description>Wow, all the layoffs so that they can report flat growth.    Wonder how many more layoffs so that they can continue to report flat growth.  Perhaps this is what is driving the layoffs. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, all the layoffs so that they can report flat growth.    Wonder how many more layoffs so that they can continue to report flat growth.  Perhaps this is what is driving the layoffs.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: guest</title><link>http://goingconcern.com/2009/09/update-deloitte-still-stalling-on-global-revenue-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-2455</link> <dc:creator>guest</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:57:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://wp.goingconcern.com/2009/09/update-deloitte-still-stalling-on-global-revenue-numbers/#comment-2455</guid> <description>Only 300+ people working for Deloitte in the US are CPAs? Seriously? That&#039;s only an average of 3-4 per office. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only 300+ people working for Deloitte in the US are CPAs? Seriously? That&#8217;s only an average of 3-4 per office.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching using memcached
Object Caching 225/230 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: cache.goingconcern.com

Served from: goingconcern.com @ 2010-09-10 10:40:55 -->